![]() ![]() It is shown that Rosa’s analyses of acceleration contain two suggestions for such a basis: autonomy understood as a narrative identity, and autonomy as defended by Honneth’s theory of recognition. This basis is required, however, for one to claim why certain processes of social acceleration are wrong. ![]() Following an overview of the critical analyses of time found in the works of Marx, Lukács, Weber, Adorno, Fromm, and Marcuse, the article analyzes Hartmut Rosa’s critique of social acceleration and argues that this critique lacks a firm normative basis. This article focuses on the role that the notion of temporality can and should play in the tradition of Critical Theory.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |